Sustainable Pittsburgh

Policy Recommendations for Transition Teams

April, 2000

 

BUDGET & FINANCE

Overview

The budget and planning systems of Allegheny County should be an essential tool to attain the objectives of a sustainable region. The National Council on State and Local Budgeting recently developed 59 best budget practices to assist governments in meeting future challenges. Several of those practices have direct application to Allegheny County and the development of a sustainable community:

A government should develop mechanisms to identify stakeholder concerns, needs, and priorities.

Among the mechanisms that might be considered are public hearings, surveys, meetings of leading citizens and citizen interest groups, government strategic planning processes, meetings of governmental employees, and workshops involving governmental administrative staff and/or the legislative body.

A government should regularly collect and evaluate information about trends in community condition, the external factors affecting it, opportunities that may be available, and problems and issues that need to be addressed.

These elements may include local, regional, national, and international factors affecting the community, including-economic and financial factors, demographic trends, legal and regulatory issues, social and cultural trends, physical and environmental factors, intergovernmental issues, and technological change.

A government should identify and assess the programs and services that it provides, their intended purpose, and factors that could affect their provision in the future.

A government should have a process for evaluating programs and services to determine the relationship of these programs to the needs and priorities of the community. The review should include an assessment of the programs purposes, beneficiaries and needs served, the success in achieving goals, and issues, challenges, and opportunities affecting their provision in the future. An evaluation of factors affecting service delivery also should be undertaken, such as: funding issues; changes in technology; economic, demographic, or other factors that may affect demand; and legal or regulatory changes.

A government should identify broad goals based on its assessment of the community it serves and its operating environment.

Care must be taken to evaluate the interaction between conflicting goals and develop a sufficient degree of consensus on priorities so that all stakeholders have a clear understanding of the direction in which the government is heading.

Performance benchmarks should be developed to aid in assessing how well a function, program, and/or activity is provided and how well in meets agreed upon needs.

Performance benchmarks help stakeholders better assess whether government performance in a particular area is acceptable or could be improved.

A government should provide opportunities in the budget process for obtaining stakeholder input.

Stakeholder input can be obtained in a number of ways, including public hearings, advisory commissions, informal conversations, round-table discussions, TV and video presentations, opinion surveys, neighborhood meetings, office hours, letter writing, telephone calls, and email. A general-purpose public hearing shortly before final decisions are made on the budget is not adequate as the sole means of soliciting stakeholder input, especially on major issues. The process developed for obtaining stakeholder input should ensure that information is gathered in a timely and complete manner to be useful in budget decision-making.

A government should have a financial planning process that assesses the long-term financial implications of current and proposed policies, programs, and assumptions and that develops appropriate strategies to achieve its goals.

The financial plan can include: an analysis of financial trends, assessments of problems or opportunities facing the jurisdiction, and a long-term forecast of revenues and expenditures that use alternative economic, planning, and policy assumptions.

 

Examples of Best Practices

Many local governments around the country are using the budget process to address issues of sustainability. For instance, Austin, Toronto, and Tucson have all incorporated sustainable goals and strategies into their budget and management structures.

The Toronto experience has led that community to realize that "applying sustainability principles to civic life would not only shift how we think about the outcomes of decisions, it also would suggest changes in the way decisions are made." Toronto has created a "Toronto Interdepartmental Environment Team" (TIE) to coordinate the activities of the city’s workforce to achieve the desired goals developed through a very public process.

Tucson, Arizona used a very public process to identify 17 goals that will lead toward a Livable Tucson. The region also developed indicators and benchmarks that are used to assess the attainment of those goals.

 

Recommendations

To implement Austin's vision of a sustainable community, the region’s legislative body has developed a budget process and a management organization that focuses on achieving the following outcomes. We recommend that Allegheny County review the below elements and incorporate them into its budget and finance goals:

Develop a CIP (Capital Improvement Projects) Sustainability Matrix that provides a perspective on capital improvement projects that encompass equity, environmental, and economic feasibility and foster a long-term viable and vibrant community. The CIP sustainability matrix is used in conjunction with several more traditional evaluative tools in prioritizing projects to be considered for a bond issue or capital improvement program. Thus, the department preference, the economic affordability analysis, and the legally mandated basis for projects will all be taken into account with the sustainability matrix results.

Create and foster a public process to review the development and attainment of desired goals

Organize the governmental management structure in a way that facilitates accountability for the attainment of desired goals

Develop and implement sustainability assessments and sustainable operation training for all government departments over a 5-year period

Establish and implement sustainable purchasing and building guidelines

Establish a local government technology transfer effort to locate and disseminate proven sustainable technology advances from other locales

Facilitate development of improved cost-benefit analysis parameters that integrate economic tools with the sustainability agenda for use by the organization’s risk manager and financial staff