|
September
24, 2002
Mr.
Chuck Imbrogno
Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission
425 Sixth Avenue, Suite 2500
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Dear
Chuck:
Thank
you for the opportunity for the Sustainable Pittsburgh Urban Cycling
Committee to learn about the Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission and Port
Authority of Allegheny County's Eastern Corridor Transit Study. We appreciate your having targeted the cycling community as
an important constituency for envisioning transit and mobility linkages
and support your efforts.
The
following are suggestions related to enhancing cycling options:
- Continue
to integrate bike/pedestrian trails and cycling facilities with
transit (e.g., bike racks at transfer stations, bike racks on buses
and trains, etc.). New
infrastructure should accommodate separate facility for
bicycle/pedestrian use.
- When
making investments, use those investments to leverage cycling
interests (e.g., trail right-of-way along potential Allegheny Valley
commuter rail).
- When
developing the Transportation System Management Alternative engage
groups such as Sustainable Pittsburgh with intent to provide input and
raise resources necessary to implement bicycle/pedestrian investments
that are feasible.
- Use
transit investment to leverage Transit Oriented Development (and joint
municipal planning) to enhance investments in bicycle/pedestrian
improvements in communities in which the investment is located or
directly benefits. Make
this a condition for communities to be eligible for local transit
investments.
- Develop
opportunities to run bicycle/pedestrian facilities parallel and
intersecting to transit and provide choice of cycling or walking to
destinations.
- Retrofit
busways to accommodate a dedicated bike lane or shared use. Include sufficient width in new busways for the same.
- Include
in the transit study pedestrian/bicycle scenarios based upon the
completion of the northern sections of the Mon-Fayette Expressway and
the possibility that it will remain unfinished.
- Include
review of the City of Pittsburgh Bike Plan in the transit study to
ensure integration with current proposals and a unified system.
- Develop
analysis and recommendations for bike lanes from Downtown, thru
Oakland, and to the east.
- Modify
your public open house input meetings to include a pre-determined and
advertised time for facilitated discussion of plans and findings.
Also,
as discussed in the meeting, we would appreciate a copy of the abbreviated
"Purpose and Needs Statement" when available.
We will gladly recommend persons with bicycle/pedestrian interests
for your Focus Groups where you provide the lists for review.
Finally, the Urban Cycling Committee would be interested in a
briefing on your two other transit studies (Regional and Airport
Corridor).
We
support the idea that new investments in transit need to be significant,
rather than modest incremental improvements and should specifically
include bicycle/pedestrian accommodations. Making transit a truly
attractive and competitive alternative to an automobile trip requires
major investments in frequency, reliability and user-amenities. But over
the long term, this investment more than pays off -- in economic
development, environmental benefits and social equity.
Sincerely,
Marshall
Cohen
John Stephen
Co-Chairs
SP Urban Cycling Committee
*Sampling
of SP Urban Cycling Committee member organizations:
Bike
Pittsburgh
Community Design Center of Pittsburgh
Friends of the Riverfront
Pittsburgh Downtown Partnership
Western PA Field Institute
Western PA Wheelmen
cc.
Jim
Hassinger, Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission
Paul
Skoutelas, Port Authority of Allegheny County
David
Wohlwill, Port Authority of Allegheny County
SP
Advisory Board |